[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 113866] The option to print text in black, secretly also affects PDF export

bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org
Thu Nov 30 00:51:29 UTC 2017


https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113866

--- Comment #11 from xghost <h.k.ghost at gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #7)
> I disagree here:
> If I use "Export to PDF", then I expect, that the PDF looks like the
> document on screen.
> "Export to PDF" is no printing. Printing is always in regard to a special
> printer. But the resulting pdf-file can be printed to varies printers having
> different properties.
> "Export to PDF" is no printing, because it allows embedding the document,
> security settings, signatures and watermark.
> It is a setting in section "print". Such setting should not influence other
> exports. For example, if you select "Brochure" in the printer settings, I'm
> sure, you still want the pdf to have the normal page order.

I agree. I also understand Heiko Tietze's point about not wanting to duplicate
the Print settings/UI in the PDF export UI. It seems (to me) like a fundamental
part of the issue is that some have coupled two different concepts/ideas:

1. printing a document in a printer; and
2. exporting a document in one format X to another format Y

To me, printing implies an actual physical printer and physical paper whereas
exporting implies more of a transformation (i.e. format conversion). For
example, GIMP can "export" its .xsd files into other formats such as .png,
.jpeg, etc. and I think that makes sense. None of those involve printing a
document.


(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #6)
> the question is rather if users understand that exporting a PDF is printing. I would say yes.

I disagree.

I think that was more of an unintended coincidence where it simply turned out
well and/or people figured it out in most cases, at least until a more obscure
issue like this one comes up, rather than it being an instance of actual
conscious understanding and awareness.

For example, I see the "Export to PDF" option more like a "Convert my current
document to a PDF file" and not as a "Print this document to a PDF". In other
words, I had always interpreted "export" as a synonym for "convert" or
"transform" rather than for "print", which tends to imply the use of an actual
physical printer.

Thus, when it became clear that the options meant for my printer were actually
affecting the options for my exports/conversions, it stood out as a very
awkward and unexpected thing. The idea of calling it "Print to PDF" I think
will blur an important, even if subtle, conceptual distinction and may cause
more problems than it solves.

I think the idea of printing and exporting should be decoupled more explicitly,
as they're (IMHO) two different/separate concepts that should not be thought of
as being one and the same thing. To me, that'd be similar to saying that a dog
and a cat are the same thing simply because they both have hair, 4 legs, and a
tail :)

In fact, this very issue caused me a *lot* of extra work during my MS Project
report, especially with code snippets that I had painstakingly highlighted with
different colors in the original document, but would always get rendered in
black in the PDF I was exporting it to... I had to spend a significant amount
of time/effort working around the issue by replacing all the code snippets in
the document for TextBox objects just to get the syntax highlighting to show up
correctly, among other details and issues I won't go into. Needless to say, it
was very frustrating.

I didn't report this at the time, because I didn't have time to go around
discussing things, and I think this will be the case for most people who do end
up running into this kind of situation.


(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #6)
> The alternative to duplicate all these options for PDF sounds much more awkward to me. 

I agree. My comment there was more about getting the conversation going, rather
than seriously requesting that everything be duplicated. I'm more interested in
the conceptual distinction that leads users to expect certain specific and
different behaviors.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


More information about the Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list