[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 90921] FOOTNOTES: Allow to place footnotes at the bottom of the text

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90921

V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote at utsa.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |UNCONFIRMED
                 CC|                            |heiko.tietze at documentfounda
                   |                            |tion.org,
                   |                            |libreoffice-ux-advise at lists
                   |                            |.freedesktop.org
           Keywords|                            |needsUXEval
     Ever confirmed|1                           |0

--- Comment #24 from V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote at utsa.edu> ---

In reply to adaw2 from comment #22)
> The latest alleged solution is still a failure:
> (1) The attachment did not resolve the problem. Note the gap between text
> and footnotes on the first page, compared to the lack of gap between text
> and footnotes on the second page.

That is exactly the correct formatting--the reflink for each footnote _must_
appear on the page where the footnote is added to the bottom of the page. The
blank space _will_ expand or contract page to page depending on the size of the
footnote for the reflink appearing on the page! Subsequent Paragraph content
holding reflink(s) is free to move to the following page to allow the preceding
footnote to grow.

 (The problem only appears to be *somewhat*
> addressed, by coincidence, due to the position and spacing of the footnotes;
> see #2.) 

No coincidence.

> (2) The attachment was formatted differently; notice the blank line between
> footnotes in my document which is not present in the alleged solution. Once
> you correct the footnote formatting in the alleged solution, the problem is
> exacerbated and the document looks like mine.
> 

No, attachment 155413 was prepared is with 'Default' page and paragraph style
formatting with just paragraph line spacing set to double, as that seemed to be
the requested format.

> Again, the section method is not a real solution--it only appears to be in
> certain situations.

It is not an appearance of solution--it is the only solution that is viable
(i.e. does not require major refactoring) page layout.

@adaw2 (not even the OP) has been unable to prepare legitimate, reproducible
example(s) screenshot(s) showing what formatting they seek, and what exactly is
perceived as lacking by using an appropriately formatted section to hold
paragraph and reflink'd footnotes.

My UX input remains as in comment 6 as this WFM, and should otherwise be a WF.

=> Unconfirmed and back for UX-advise.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.