[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 146033] Output to HTML: Field shadings shouldn't be part of Html-export
bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org
bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org
Mon Dec 20 19:44:42 UTC 2021
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146033
Dieter <dgp-mail at gmx.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |needsUXEval
CC| |dgp-mail at gmx.de,
| |libreoffice-ux-advise at lists
| |.freedesktop.org
Whiteboard| QA:needsComment |
Summary|Output to HTML: background |Output to HTML: Field
|color of UI used |shadings shouldn't be part
| |of Html-export
--- Comment #2 from Dieter <dgp-mail at gmx.de> ---
I think we have different questions here:
Application colours dialog: Is "User interface element" the appropriate name? I
think it is not, if this means, that colours are only colours of the UI, but
not of the content itself (see attachment 176677).
If colour of field shadings should only affect UI, it's a bug, if not it's the
expected behaviour, because you can disable field shading with Strg+F8.
So general question is: Should field shadings be part of Html-Export (and PDF
or EPUB export)?
cc: Design Team to clarifiy these questions.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Libreoffice-ux-advise
mailing list