[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 152558] Calc Cell Borders are inconsistent with the drop-down graphic selector. Also, No help page for manual definitions

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152558

--- Comment #8 from Colin <that.man.colin at gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #7)

> double "0.009cm 0.009cm 0.009cm"
> double "0.026cm 0.026cm 0.002cm"
> double "0.007cm 0.007cm 0.014cm"
>                double "0.026cm 0.004cm 0.053cm"
> double "0cm 0.026cm 0.026cm"
> double "0.014cm 0.007cm 0.007cm"
>                double "0.053cm 0.004cm 0.026cm"

> From [3]: "The first value specifies the width of the inner line, The second
> value specifies the distance between the two lines, and The third value
> specifies the width of the outer line."
> 
The two I pushed out are the worst offenders in my comment #6 because the
symetry requires them to be flipped both vertically and horizontally to ensure
the different line weights actually "mitre" together properly.

But anywhere the line weights (1st & 3rd parameters) are not identical will
still not "bind" the corners correctly.

The current practice matches bottom & left with continuity of weight and top &
right but then the vertices at bottom & right and top & left flip the line
weight connections.

It's not so significant with lower font weight cells but larger cells, merged
cells and zoomed documents clearly demonstrate the anomaly.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.