[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 120269] The descriptions of Safe Mode options are misleading

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120269

Heiko Tietze <heiko.tietze at documentfoundation.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|needsUXEval                 |
         Whiteboard|target:6.3.0                |
                 CC|libreoffice-ux-advise at lists |heiko.tietze at documentfounda
                   |.freedesktop.org            |tion.org
           Severity|normal                      |enhancement

--- Comment #19 from Heiko Tietze <heiko.tietze at documentfoundation.org> ---
We discussed the mockup in the design meeting. From the minutes:

  + looks good (John) but
     + is there an autobackup to "restore last known working state"
     + what is "undo modifications" compared to restore?
     + too many options, maybe remove "reset state of extensions"
   + Apply button is unclear (comment by Roman)
     + restarts with the chosen settings- clear to me (John)
   + mutual dependency between user profile and extension (comment by Cor)
     + unclear which one; if clearing entire profile, for example, means to 
       also clear the extensions we could automatically check this option
   + separate bundled/shared aka user/application extensions (comment by
Samuel)
     + if needed we have to add an extra section/frame under Extension (which
would
       become "User Extension") with the same options for "Application
Extensions"
     + users are probably unaware of what extensions are bundled and what
uninstalling
       means; better to have one option for both (John)
   + "Backup user profile" and "Restore from file" unclear (Cor)
     + we could just allow to restore from last known configuration (and
consequently
       backup overwrites the one setting)
   + continue in save mode vs. apply unclear (Cor, Roman)
     + clear to me (John)
     + different naming welcome but better have tooltip explaining the function
   + some image(s) make the UI nicer

I think we can iron out the missing bits when the implementation is being done.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.