[Bug 160682] HTML "page style" is not a page style - move this functionality elsewhere
bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org
bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org
Wed Apr 17 10:10:25 UTC 2024
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160682
--- Comment #4 from Cor Nouws <cno at nouenoff.nl> ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #3)
> (In reply to Cor Nouws from comment #2)
> > Still it allows the user to do start a new Writer doc, and change to a HTML
> > version.
>
> I'm not sure I understand what you mean. How can you do this? Do you mean
> Web View? Well, that doesn't apply the HTML page style IIANM.
So you don't know how to use the product, and still you claim that various page
styles are nonsensical..
> > > 3. Converse of (2.) - when editing an HTML document, we _can't_ edit the
> > > HTML page style.
> > After starting a new HTML document, one can just edit the page style..?
>
> Ok, true, but only from the Format menu and not through the Styles sidebar.
> So, my point (3.) is a bit weak.
Just invalid.
> > I do not object per see. What is the solution you suggest to use in stead?
>
> I think it should be "per se"
> https://www.grammar-monster.com/Latin_terms/per_se.htm
>
> Anyway, I am not _sure_ about what the solution should be. But one option I
> was thinking of is for HTML documents to use their own template. When you
> start a regular document, you open the default Writer template. If we had a
> default template for HTML documents, or even simply a template named HTML
> (more crude, but easier to implement UI-wise) - we could take its default
> page style.
IIRC the default Writer template is hard coded (or it was); the user can set a
specific template in stead.
But a template looks sensible to me.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Libreoffice-ux-advise
mailing list