[Bug 159167] Check whether formula in conditional formatting are valid
bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org
bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org
Fri Aug 2 08:53:52 UTC 2024
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159167
Heiko Tietze <heiko.tietze at documentfoundation.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |87351
CC|libreoffice-ux-advise at lists |heiko.tietze at documentfounda
|.freedesktop.org |tion.org
OS|Windows (All) |All
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Summary|Conditional formatting of |Check whether formula in
|cells based on rules for |conditional formatting are
|checking values greater |valid
|than or less than |
Keywords|needsUXEval |
--- Comment #16 from Heiko Tietze <heiko.tietze at documentfoundation.org> ---
(In reply to Rafael Lima from comment #5)
> AFAIK it is not possible to define a conditional formatting rule where the
> condition is a range.
I wouldn't expect a range for simple comparisons like "is equal to" but when it
comes to "is in top N elements" the situation is less clear.
https://help.libreoffice.org/24.2/en-US/text/scalc/01/05120100.html
> It has to be either a single cell or the result of a formula.
Using MIN(A$1:A$2) as suggested in comment 3 works well. The issue was that
"$Tabelle1.$A$2:$E$2" is not a formula; less than a range does not compute.
Nevertheless I agree with room for improvement. If a function does not return a
simple value like A1:A2 or MIN() without parameter, it should trigger a warning
and not become accepted.
I'll change the summary accordingly. If you disagree, Alexander, feel free to
revert.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87351
[Bug 87351] [META] Conditional formatting bugs and enhancements
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Libreoffice-ux-advise
mailing list