[Bug 161032] Allow removing bundled extensions

bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org
Mon May 27 10:16:06 UTC 2024


https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161032

Heiko Tietze <heiko.tietze at documentfoundation.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |sberg.fun at gmail.com
           See Also|                            |https://bugs.documentfounda
                   |                            |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33
                   |                            |060
           Keywords|                            |needsDevAdvice

--- Comment #2 from Heiko Tietze <heiko.tietze at documentfoundation.org> ---
Seems to be a FAQ:
Bug 136010 - Cannot disable extensions installed by package manager (=> NAB)
Bug 33060 - Bundled extensions can not be disabled (=> WF)
Bug 55364 - Bundled Extensions create huge amount of files in appdata (=> WFM)
Bug 53009 - Large UserInstallation's user/extensions/bundled/ tree (=> FIXED)
Bug 32377 - *NO* Bundled Extensions, please

Stephan did a lot work around this topic. He argued in bug 33060 comment 19
"...obvious use case for bundled (and/or shared) extensions is to let an admin
install an extension that enforces some feature", and for dictionaries "The
original rationale for that was that these could have different update cycles
than LO...". 

I support the request however. The admin who wants to protect extensions is one
use case but there is also the average user who should have full control over
the application.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


More information about the Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list