[Bug 159227] Special Character selection applying another font

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159227

Buovjaga <ilmari.lauhakangas at libreoffice.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Ever confirmed|1                           |0
           Keywords|                            |needsUXEval
             Status|REOPENED                    |UNCONFIRMED
                 CC|                            |libreoffice-ux-advise at lists
                   |                            |.freedesktop.org

--- Comment #11 from Buovjaga <ilmari.lauhakangas at libreoffice.org> ---
(In reply to Jan Lachnitt from comment #10)
> (In reply to Buovjaga from comment #9)
> > Ok, reading bug 155957 and bug 159572, this is an intentional decision. Jan
> > wants the previous behaviour, but it could lead to confusing situations.
> 
> Thank you for the references.
> 
> I see that the original font must be preserved if the character is in a
> private use area. But otherwise I would use the present font, to prevent
> unwanted and unnecessary (and ugly) font mixing.

Ok, so you are asking for more complex logic in the code. Let's ask what the UX
team thinks. I wonder how expensive performance-wise such a scanning operation
would be. There can be lots of glyphs in a font...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.