[Libreoffice] defaulting to --without-java ... (?)
Norbert Thiebaud
nthiebaud at gmail.com
Thu Dec 2 17:24:42 PST 2010
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Caolán McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 16:33 +0000, Michael Meeks wrote:
>> So,
>>
>> As part of the quest to make LibreOffice easier to build; and in
>> parallel to annoy developers who are missing those java implemented
>> features into re-writing them into C++, I was wondering:
>>
>> would anyone scream if we defaulted configure to --without-java ?
>
> That's surely a terrible idea. Now we default to building something
> which isn't the same as what will realistically be deployed, Base won't
> work out of box and all java extensions won't work.
I have no sympathy for Java but I agree with Caolan's argument.
Norbert
>
> C.
>
> _______________________________________________
> LibreOffice mailing list
> LibreOffice at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
>
More information about the LibreOffice
mailing list