[Libreoffice] LibreOffice-3.3-rc1 git tag and fixes reviewing

[Petr Mladek]

Miklos Vajna píše v Pá 03. 12. 2010 v 17:38 +0100:
> On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 11:34:13AM -0500, Kohei Yoshida <kyoshida at novell.com> wrote:
> > > It is enough?
> > 
> > I can deal with it, but making it identical with the git tag would make
> > it much easier.
> 
> BTW, what is the reason the tag is LIBREOFFICE_3_3_0_1 instead of
> libreoffice-3.3.0.1? IIRC cvs did not allow dots in tag names, but that
> is not the case with git. Or is there any other reason?

Good questuion! We use the cvs naming scheme just from the historical
reasons. I would not mind to use the libreoffice-3.3.0.1 variant.


Best Regards,
Petr