[Libreoffice] BOOL conflict

[Thomas Klausner]

On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 10:49:27AM +0000, Michael Meeks wrote:
> 	Urk; another reason not to use BOOL I guess :-)
> 
> 	What does your iodbcunix.h include ? I guess we might need to do some
> hideous #define magic for the iodbcunix.h headers here: did you get a
> solution ?

Not yet.

> 	I might be tempted to do:
> 
> #define BOOL IODBC_BOOL
> #include <iodbcunix.h>
> #undef BOOL

If I only knew where it's included.

> 	or somesuch, if this is the only conflict.

Is a general sal_Bool -> Bool, sal_True -> true, sal_False -> false
replacement ok? Then we could remove that type...
 Thomas