[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Easy hack patches, remove non-compiled code

Thorsten Behrens thb at documentfoundation.org
Thu Nov 4 07:47:13 PDT 2010

Kevin Hunter wrote:
> Further (with exceptions, of course), automagic tools provide a much
> more consistent and at least acceptable-by-all metric for how code
> should look.  (And I would argue that how code looks via the
> squint-test is very *much* pertinent for longer term gathering of
> new developers.)
Quite. Played with uncrustify a bit, and like it a lot.

-- Thorsten
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20101104/7a061aee/attachment.pgp>

More information about the LibreOffice mailing list