[Libreoffice] [PATCH] improve style according to cppcheck

[Norbert Thiebaud]

On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Christian Lohmaier
<lohmaier+libreoffice at googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Takeshi Abe <tabe at fixedpoint.jp> wrote:
>> [cppcheck patches]
>
> I'm curious: Why does cppcheck "complain" about "for.... i++" and
> suggests/demands pre-increment instead (for ... ++i)?
>
> Is there any noticable difference?

In my opinion:
If there is a noticeable difference -- in a place where the 2 forms
are indeed interchangeable -- then this is a bug to be filed with the
compiler.
And if they are not interchangeable in the context, then cppcheck
should be silent....

Norbert

>
> ciao
> Christian
> _______________________________________________
> LibreOffice mailing list
> LibreOffice at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
>