[Libreoffice] compilation failed in lotuswordpro

[Caolán McNamara]

On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 20:58 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 16:30:52 +0100
> Caolán McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > We're in transition from one build system to the other, and its still
> > unclear to me in the new one how to set one target as a dependency of
> > the other :-). I know in Module_lotuswordpro.mk I want the target
> > inside CppunitTest_foo that uses services.rdb to depend on
> > Package_qa_cppunit.mk which calls the Makefile that creates
> > services.rdb so that services.rdb exists before we attempt to use it.
> 
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/filters/commit/?id=3671d9e96625c96d42276c36652e7ccf2eed5c3d
> 
> The uses_ure still is new and makes it currently only depend on the
> services.rdb from solver. It is not really relevant yet as we are
> building that file in the old build system still, so your change to
> prj/build.lst is dead-on. Once we migrate ure to gbuild it will be good
> to have the uses_ure stuff in place already.

Nah, that "I need the ure services.rdb" bit is straightforward enough. 

There's a secondary issue (afaict) wrt parallel building, isn't there ?

i.e. gb_Module_add_check_targets of "Package_qa_cppunit" and
"CppunitTest_lotuswordpro", i.e. the test that uses the locally
generated services.rdb (in addition to the ure one) doesn't (seem to?)
depend on the custom Package rule that generates that local
services.rdb.

e.g. make -sr clean && make -sr -j10 should trigger it fairly reliably.

maybe we don't really need custom rules here, its all one of a common
pattern, perhaps worth adding a gb_CppunitTest_add_component_files sort
of thing and stick the "build a local services.rdb by stripping out
"program"" into a common rule that takes its input from that and can be
a optional dependency of the gb_CppunitTest_CppunitTest rule and can get
rid then of the custom rules in sc and lotuswordpro etc.

C.