[Libreoffice] SfxItemSet reimplementation (was: va_start without va_end)
julien2412
serval2412 at yahoo.fr
Mon Aug 8 03:27:35 PDT 2011
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
>
> Hi Norbert, all,
>
> On Thu, 4 Aug 2011 20:47:43 -0500
> Norbert Thiebaud <nthiebaud at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> The va_end manpage, on linux says:
>> "Each invocation of va_start() must be matched by a corresponding
>> invocation of va_end() in the _same function_"
>> (emphasis is mine)
>> so it's not just ugly, but also 'wrong'...
>
> FWIW, I tried a clean new from the group up reimplementation of
> SfxItemset once in cws new_itemsets:
> ...
> Maybe somebody is interested in integrating the replacement Itemset? I
> added an EasyHack for it:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39849
> Although that is a truely challenging task, it would also be most
> rewarding.
>
> Best,
>
> Bjoern
>
>
> --
> https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-michaelsen
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LibreOffice mailing list
> LibreOffice at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
>
I don't know if i can do this easyhack but what about the 3 cases of vm_end
? Should vm_end be added ?
If yes, i can commit and pushed them for the 2 first cases. For the third
case, i can also do it but I can't check before since it impacts above all
Windows parts and I compile on Linux.
Julien.
--
View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/va-start-without-va-end-tp3223648p3235171.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the LibreOffice
mailing list