[Libreoffice] oox fun in bringing it into tail_build...

Bjoern Michaelsen bjoern.michaelsen at canonical.com
Fri Aug 12 06:37:18 PDT 2011

On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 15:27:11 +0200
Bjoern Michaelsen
<bjoern.michaelsen at canonical.com> wrote:

> It would remove the touch-target of the animations header (the empty
> file that signals to the build system 'everything for the header
> target is done'), yes -- but it would not remove the headers
> themselves: It doesnt even know about them as they are declared in
> animations. So apart from a few possible superfluous relinkings of
> libs using the animations headers, everything is fine.
> gb_Library_add_package_headers is the way to go.

OTOH, the packages are registered in the module anyway, so a "make
clean" in sd will remove the sd packages anyway. So maybe the
dependency of the LinkTarget clean target on the package clean target
can/should be removed anyway (thereby preventing the superfluous




More information about the LibreOffice mailing list