[Libreoffice] [michael.meeks at suse.com: [Fwd: Re: build failure in tail_build]]

[Bjoern Michaelsen]

Hi there,

as this is a WaE breaker, I would suggest to build without --enable-werror
until we figured out if boost or gcc is wrong here. In general it is a good
idea to stay away from fancy configure-flags in the beginning(*).

Best,

Bjoern

see also: https://lkml.org/lkml/2006/11/29/249 Linus about the "perfect kernel" ;)

----- Forwarded message from Michael Meeks <michael.meeks at suse.com> -----

Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 14:20:17 +0000
From: Michael Meeks <michael.meeks at suse.com>
To: Bjoern Michaelsen <bjoern.michaelsen at canonical.com>
Subject: [Fwd: Re: [Libreoffice] build failure in tail_build]
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.1

The logs - I guess the list bounced them :-)

-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Daisuke Nishino <niboshi000 at gmail.com>
To: michael.meeks at suse.com
Cc: libreoffice at lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Libreoffice] build failure in tail_build
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:31:11 +0900

Michael,

Thank you for reply.
I attached the log produced by make -r in tail_build (make.log.zip).

Additionally, make2.log is the one produced by running 'make -r'
immediately after the first 'make -r', both in tail_build.
This one includes more informative error messages.

I hope this helps fix the problem.

My system is Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot.
$ uname -a
Linux amane 3.0.0-12-generic #20-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 7 14:50:42 UTC 2011
i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

 
Thanks


On 14 December 2011 03:32, Michael Meeks <michael.meeks at suse.com> wrote:
        Hi Daisuke,
        
        On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 00:47 +0900, Daisuke Nishino wrote:
        > Actually make in tail_build subdirectory was not suceeded.
        
        
               Bother.
        
        > Its exit code was 2. (I was confused because I was using tee
        command
        > to pipe the output, accordingly subsequent $? evaluated to 0)
        > No error message was produced anyway.
        
        
               Ok - that is annoying indeed. To get a failure without
        any error
        message is quite unusual and unhelpful of course.
        
               Can you provide full logs of a failing 'make' in
        tail_build, and more
        information on your system ?
        
               Sorry for the delay,
        
               ATB,
        
                       Michael.
        
        --
        michael.meeks at suse.com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
        



-- 
Daisuke Nishino

-- 
michael.meeks at suse.com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot




----- End forwarded message -----