[Libreoffice] [REVIEW-3-4-5] Reverted - Fix overly zealous check in Zip package consistency

Michael Stahl mstahl at redhat.com
Thu Dec 22 15:40:28 PST 2011

On 23/12/11 00:29, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
>>> Michael Meeks wrote:
>>>> can't we just revert the original fix there ?
>> Reverted with Stephan's review in -3-4.
> Sigh, we had branched off 3-4-5 meanwhile, which needs 3 reviews -
> Michael, Petr, would you want to approve the revert?

i'd say reverting a patch that has demonstrably introduced a regression
shouldn't need 3 reviews.

if it really needs that, +1 from me

More information about the LibreOffice mailing list