[Libreoffice] RFC Operation Spamzilla (resent to include original -dev list post)
Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michaelsen at canonical.com
Fri Dec 23 04:32:25 PST 2011
Hi Rainer,
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 08:34:12AM +0100, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
> of course I see the problem, but I have absolutely no problem with
> that fact, because I use a query basing on my experience.
Yes, but having to rely on somebody elses experience is a big barrier to
newcomers and we should keep needed knowledge as open and as broad as possible.
> I recommend only to modify bugs what are NEW and fulfill some
> additional criteria (no user with QA-Experience is involved), what
> leads to this query:
>
+<https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?type1-0-0=notsubstring&type0-1-0=nowordssubstr&list_id=27519&field0-1-0=commenter&field0-0-0=commenter&query_based_on=LibO_Unconfirmed_4&emailtype1=exact&ch
+fieldto=2011-10-17&query_format=advanced&emailassigned_to1=1&chfield=%5BBug%20creation%5D&value0-2-0=jeffdchang%40gmail.com%20%20yfjiang%40novell.com&chfieldfrom=2010-10-01&value0-1-0=andre.schnabel
+%40gmx.net%20drew%40baseanswers.com%20%20%20maand%40gmx.de%20%20wope%40gmx.com%20%20baur.steven%40googlemail.com%20%20dmx404%40gmail.com&value1-0-0=CONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&field0-2-0=commenter&emai
+l1=libreoffice-bugs%40lists.freedesktop.org&type0-0-0=nowordssubstr&value0-0-0=LibreOffice%40bielefeldundbuss.de%20%20%20detective.conan.1412%40gmail.com%20%20iamtester8%40gmail.com%20jbf.faure%40or
+ange.fr%20%20jr%40natural-computing.de%20%20fyvaao%40ya.ru%20%20vitriol_vitriol%40katamail.com%20%20gerard.fargeot%40orange.fr%20%20bugs%40eikota.de&type0-2-0=nowordssubstr&field1-0-0=status_whiteb
> oard&product=LibreOffice>
Yes, actually I want to use a query like that. Up to now I used the one at:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport_Details#Whiteboard
but I will go with the one from the BugTriage page now.
> And - may be you will get some indignant comments because of Bugs
> 30876, 31022, 31055, 33232 ;-)
Even if there are ~20-50 bugs that would need to be changed back, it is a lot
better than having >2000 (of 6400 total) in an inconsistent state.
> Please involve libreoffice-qa at lists.freedesktop.org into such discussions!
Why arent you on nabble.documentfoundation.org btw? I keep forgetting about
that list for that reason.
Best,
Bjoern
More information about the LibreOffice
mailing list