[Libreoffice] [PATCH] some changes for better performance, writer.
Kayo Hamid
kayo.hamid at gekkolinux.com.br
Sat Jan 8 15:04:20 PST 2011
On 08/01/2011 17:00, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> I' confused:
> - sal_Int32 nCount = xAcc->getAccessibleChildCount();
> -
> - for( sal_Int32 i=0; i< nCount; i++ )
> + const sal_Int32 nCount = xAcc->getAccessibleChildCount();
> + sal_Int32 i = 0;
> +
> + while(i< nCount)
> {
> - if( xAcc->getAccessibleChild( i ) == xThis )
> - return i;
> + if( xAcc->getAccessibleChild( i ) == xThis )
> + return i;
> + i++;
> }
> +
>
> Unless I'm really dense: this simply change a for() loop into a
> while() loop doing exactly the same thing
> Why is it supposed to improve performance ?
>
> as for the rest:
> Did you really measure that turning a passed-by-value scalar (which
> caller's value cannot be modified by the callee, by definition) into a
> const passed by value
> scalar, has _actually_ any performance impact ?
>
> Norbert
Hello Norbert, first of all i'm new at coding, I really do not know if
we have any improve, but after looking a lot for c++ performance tips
(and I continue looking and reading tips for that) I have in my mind
some things like:
for/while -> it's better to use while, it's not a huge improve, but you
can find tips that say 'use while, it's better'. I just do it.
const -> my goal is to change the local variable to const is to put it
in read-only, wich is better, but in that case that we receive
pass-by-value, is my fault. The problem is that i do not known that
this method returns reference.
It's because all this that I ask for one review, I want to learn with
everyone here. I'm in the right way? My goal is to code things that are
better, even with minimal improves.
revol_
More information about the LibreOffice
mailing list