[Libreoffice] [FIXED] Re: [PATCH] possible null-dereferencing found by cppcheck

[Caolán McNamara]

On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 18:55 +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> cppcheck said that
> > [impress/sd/source/ui/func/fusnapln.cxx:186]: (error) Possible null pointer dereference: pPV
> which is, at a glance, worth noting.
> It would be great if someone shows the de-referenceing has no problem,
> otherwise the attached patch may provides a workaround.

The complaint is because of the route through the logic where pPV can
definitely be NULL when it hits those lines, I reckon the easiest thing
is to ensure it's always set at the start, which will silence cppcheck
and appears to be the way it works in practice.

C.