[Libreoffice] [PATCH] [UX] Rename "Default Formatting" --> "Clear Direct Formatting"
oolst at nouenoff.nl
Sat Jan 22 02:26:57 PST 2011
Hi Octavio, Christoph,
Thanks for this Q&A.
I'm always interested in the subject, because I use formatting and
explain the use of "Default formatting" to my classes.
I support the approach from Octavio.
Octavio Alvarez wrote (22-01-11 05:49)
> Hi Christoph. Thanks for the comments. I'll do my best to address them
> one by one.
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:40:26 -0800, Christoph Noack
> <christoph at dogmatux.com> wrote:
>> First, thanks for the in-depth analysis and the patches, but I am not
>> that convinced that this will work as expected - at least the naming is
>> consistent behavior across the suite.
>> My rationale ...
>> "Default Formatting" does not only reset the direct / hard formatting,
>> but also applied character styles. That also makes "Clear Direct
>> Formatting" a bit inaccurate.
> Well, this is not true in LibreOffice anymore. This got implemented in
> ooo-build almost one year ago and ported to LibreOffice. See initial
> discussion at
> and applied patches at
>> The terminology "Default" is used throughout the office suite. For
>> example, the buttons "Default" resets all manual changes of an derived
>> style (Stylist).
> Didn't find it. I see "Reset" and "Standard". Is it any of those?
In Dutch, Default is translated as Standaard. And of course Standard too ;-)
So that is a problem for us. I can discuss this with the l10n people.
But also if there is no solution for it, the patches make the situation
better then what we had. And consistent.
One thing I do not see in your patches:
The top entry in the listbox Apply styles (Writer) is "Clear formatting"
That really applies the paragraph style default en removes all direct
formatting and character styles.
Is "Clear formatting" distinctive enough? Or should is be "Clear all
>> And "direct" might also be unknown to those users who are unsure what
>> "default formatting" is.
> *Exactly*, because this change is NOT for those that don't use styles.
> For them, it is a menu item that might as well not be there. This is for
> those of us who *know* how to use styles. There is no loss there.
> For us, we know the difference between formatting that is applied by
> the style and formatting that works as an override. We call it "hard
> formatting" or "direct formatting".
> 3. Help seems to back the "don't reset character styles" side:
> (it defines it here)
> 'If you format a document without Styles, it is referred to as "direct"
> formatting.' This line has been in the help since 2004.
> 'You can remove direct formatting from your document by selecting [...]
> and then choosing Format - Default Formatting'
> 'To reset all direct formatting of existing text, select [...] then choose
> the menu command Format - Default Formatting'
> ... or doesn't?
> 'Removes direct formatting and formatting by character styles from the
> (inconsistent with the definition)
> This is another instance of confusion caused by the mess that this has
> become because the name itself is confusing. When a *developer* sees
> "default formatting" he will apply his own interpretation of "default"
> and code accordingly.
> (BTW, I think I missed that last line in the patch. Gotta correct that.)
>> The string length will make the menu wider, which gets an issue when the
>> English text gets translated into foreign languages. Especially since we
>> do have many sub-menus within this menu. Same applies to "Clear All
>> Formatting" you are planning to change.
> Of course, sorry about that. :-/ I'll need help here to make the change
> as friendly as possible to others.
> I assume menu widths automatically calculated on startup because of the
> different possible fonts and other settings that affect appearance, but
> I really don't know if this is true at all.
>> By the way, it would be great to know some more information where this
>> request came from (especially since you've invested quite a lot of
>> work). Maybe I can help somehow ... at the moment (and this is quite
>> bad) I don't have a better proposal. Sorry :-\
> See the links above for the "Default Formatting" behavioral change. I can
> gladly go further if you request it, but it was to improve functionality.
> There are two opposite-pulling forces as shown by bugs i#47893 and i#85464
> and each time this gets discussed, there are mixed opinions. Everybody
> think differently about this. The proposed rename clarifies what the new
> behavior does *exactly* as of today, so that any change follows a common
> Links to the referred bugs:
> This of course doesn't mean that a "Reset paragraph direct + all character"
> shouldn't exist. It simply needs to be clearly differentiated, maybe its
> own menu entry.
> Best regards.
> LibreOffice mailing list
> LibreOffice at lists.freedesktop.org
- giving openoffice.org its foundation :: The Document Foundation -
More information about the LibreOffice