[Libreoffice] minutes of tech. steering call ...
Cedric Bosdonnat
cedric.bosdonnat.ooo at free.fr
Fri May 20 00:27:21 PDT 2011
Hi all,
Sorry, I couldn't join yesterday. I'm just wondering where the
reviewboard action item went? is that a dropped idea or does it still
deserves some action?
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 18:13 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Attending:
> Thorsten, Andras, Kendy, Norbert, Christian, Petr,
> Rainer, David, Bjoern, Kohei
>
> * AA's done
> + announce new 4.0 wiki page (blog going live today) (Bjoern)
> + write list of things that suck for newcomers with taste (Mitch / Christian)
> + write up a time-based release rational (Italo mostly did it for Michael)
> + move all 'feature' bugs to new "most annoying for 3.5" bug (Petr)
> + list mailed with the number etc.
> + Petr to decide and come up with a static link of key bugs (Petr)
> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Release_Criteria
> + come up with a concrete single-git-repo plan (Norbert, Kendy)
> + do the surgery at 3.4.2 time when merging is over (ish)
> + generate a preferred date for a point-two release (Petr, Bjoern, David)
>
> * AA still pending:
> + research when gio came into widespread being (Caolan)
> cf. http://www.gtk.org/download-linux.html
> + the rdb setup stuff is still too cumbersome (Bjoern)
> + get SmartArt into master as an experimental feature (Thorsten)
> + investigate reviewboard and come up with a more concrete proposal (Bjoern)
> + post single-git-repo plan to the dev list (Norbert)
>
> * Agenda:
> + Action items
> + 3.4 release status (Petr)
> + RC1 going out ~now
> + large number of annoying bugs fixed
> + basic functionality is working well for users
> + RC2 / final next week
> + chasing tripple reviews for patches for 3.4.0
> + be great to broaden our reviewer base
> + TSC call time ...
> AA: + 14:00 UTC - the new consensus time (get it right next time)
> + QA update / most annoying bug skim (Rainer)
> + where should bugs live ? links to other tracking systems
> + bugs should be in freedesktop bugzilla where possible
> + sometimes good to have triage via up-streams ?
> + lots of co-workers doing great work, testing happening
> + responsiveness improving
> + investing in gnumake / Lanedo
> + no objections at all.
> + 3.5 / schedule alignment with desktop cadence
> + should sync with majority of distros & D/T S/W
> + and release 2-3 months before them
> + so distributions pick up x.y.2 or x.y.3
> + 2-3 months before
> + Freeze Dec / June
> + release mid Feb / mid Aug
> + June is too soon to freeze for 3.5
> + so skip to Dec instead
> + schedule allows for QA over holidays
> AA: + fill out the wiki with the proposed post-3.4 schedule (Petr)
> AA: + look into a plan for notifing of package updates (Thorsten, Kendy)
> + Mitch / Christian's list of things that suck (Christian)
> + multiple git repositories pain (being fixed)
> + make crashing (make bug ~fixed)
> + used to developing on a branch & testing first
> + problems with waiting for a full clean build before commit
> + delay, and waste of time often outweighs benefits
> + understandable some cross-platform problems
> + incremental building problems: cause much build grief
> + update, and build fails: can be just dependency breakage
> + gnumake again can help fix this.
> + module filenames (cryptic, windows names)
> + split modules with numeric prefixes - to help compilers
> + should have human-readable source file names
> + classes always used together - can make sense together
> + autogen is triggering when new downloads needed
> + even so old-style make dependency problems around
> + namespaces painful: com::sun:star:: ... cluttering header files
> + planned to fix for 4.0
>
> * Next time:
> + continue most-annoying things discussion (Mitch)
> + own extensions repository (Rainer)
> + discussion concerning discussion concerning
> future of our bug tracking System (Rainer)
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
http://documentfoundation.org
OOo Eclipse Integration developer
http://cedric.bosdonnat.free.fr
More information about the LibreOffice
mailing list