On 20/05/11 10:43, Noel Power wrote: > On 20/05/11 10:02, Michael Meeks wrote: >> > I prefer Michael's version, so +1 for that ( although I don't agree > with the ugly comment, to me it shows the intentional bypassing of the > dynamic binding ) > _______ I committed that version to 3.4 branch, I'm sorry I forgot the --author :-(