[Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-commits] .: stoc/source
Kevin Hunter
hunteke at earlham.edu
Tue Oct 4 14:01:23 PDT 2011
At 4:15pm -0400 Tue, 04 Oct 2011, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the patch. I think the real intent always was to
> actually look through all the returned getSuperclasses(), and the
> error that superclasses past the first one are effectively ignored
> has never been noticed.
Excellent. Was wondering, but don't yet know LO well enough to make
such declarations. Well, modulo any errors on my part, the logic I sent
in patch 1 should be the same as what was originally there, but I hope
easier to read/see for comparison/fixing.
Here is a second patch that compiles, /should/ respond to what you just
confirmed was the original intent, but is untested. (It was a random
drive by patching.) Specifically, I suppose it's obvious that this now
changes the semantics of it actually used to do. If you know how to
test it ...
Cheers,
Kevin
More information about the LibreOffice
mailing list