[Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] .: stoc/source

Kevin Hunter hunteke at earlham.edu
Wed Oct 5 00:13:14 PDT 2011

At 2:58am -0400 Wed, 05 Oct 2011, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 10/04/2011 11:01 PM, Kevin Hunter wrote:
>> Here is a second patch that compiles, /should/ respond to what you just
>> confirmed was the original intent, but is untested. (It was a random
>> drive by patching.) Specifically, I suppose it's obvious that this now
>> changes the semantics of it actually used to do. If you know how to test
>> it ...
> Yes, that's how I would have done it, too. Pushed now, thanks again. (I
> assume you already stated somewhere what license your contributions are
> under, even though that's not explicitly listed at
> <http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Developers>.)

Incidentally, do we have a set of tests for this?  I wouldn't know where 
to begin.  This was truly a "drive-by" reading of a commit and 
surrounding code.



More information about the LibreOffice mailing list