[Libreoffice] Cppcheck defect when @ is present

[julien2412]

Hello,

I got this comment of a cppcheck developper :
is this objective c++? Can the code be replaced in the tokenizer
 with plain C++ somehow?

He seems to be right about objective C++. Then I made a opengrok research, 4
files use "@try". Perhaps, there are other files which use "@ expression",
since @try and @catch are not the only "@ expressions".

 What's the best thing to do :
- to keep objective C++ parts ?
- to replace objective C++ by plain (with or without boost) C++ ?

Julien. 

--
View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Cppcheck-defect-when-is-present-tp3324103p3326563.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.