[Libreoffice] Cppcheck defect when @ is present

[Stephan Bergmann]

On 09/11/2011 01:27 PM, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote:
>> What's the best thing to do :
>> - to keep objective C++ parts ?
>> - to replace objective C++ by plain (with or without boost) C++ ?
>
> for me there are already too many languages and flavour of languages. I
> would stay with plain C++, not adding objective C++ on top

In the Mac OS X specific code parts, we do need Objective C code, to 
interface the relevant Mac APIs.

-Stephan