[Libreoffice] sfx2 et al wanting libxml2.a pointlessly

[Tor Lillqvist]

> It looks like that is explicitly requested (in a rather hacky and wrong
> way) at RepositoryFixes.mk:139 ff. -[line 128 here] - but that looks wrong anyway,
> doesnt it?

Ah, yes, I did that, now I recall, and the comment says it all, it
is/was rather ad-hoc. If these 3rd-party libs now do get built as
shared libraries for Android, too, this can be removed.

--tml