[PATCH] EasyHack Bug 46610

[Daniel Bankston [danthedev]]

On 04/04/2012 08:51 AM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 of April 2012, Daniel Bankston wrote:
>> Lubos Lunak wrote:
>>> It seems to me you are correct. I've added !IsEmpty() check to the if(),
>>> which should do what the original author wanted.
>> I'm still a little worried about that aClip object that is being
>> intersected with aRegion which is now on line 673 but was originally in the
>> conditional on the line below.  The reason I'm worried is because the aClip
>> object is used again on line 697.  I don't know if the original author knew
>> that he/she was intersecting aClip with aRegion on line 673.  So what I'm
>> asking is: Should we completely remove SetClipRegion( aClip ) on line 673?
>   I'm not familar with the code, but I think the current version is correct
> (and it matches what the previous code did, since 2002). It looks to me that
> aRegion is the clipping region for the entire operation and so clipping each
> of the iterations by it too should be correct.
>
Ok, I'll leave it be then.  Thanks for pushing and looking at it!