Updating the documentation in the IDL files?
mstahl at redhat.com
Wed Apr 11 11:56:24 PDT 2012
On 11/04/12 19:52, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
>> But if you have anything more specific about com/sun/star/lang I could probably have a
>> look there.
> Well, starting with XComponent.idl, I don't see any high-level
> description what a "component" *is* ;)
> Or am I expecting too much from the documentation in the IDL files
> (and generated from that), is it so that the reader is expected to
> have grokked some other, more prose style (not doc-comment -style)
> documentation first before reading the IDL comments?
generally the DevGuide has the high-level documentation; the odk build
also inserts various references to the DevGuide into the generated HTML
documentation (which is one reason why autodoc is still required), for
example take a look at:
More information about the LibreOffice