[PATCH] fix proposed for fdo#48368

julien2412 serval2412 at yahoo.fr
Mon Apr 16 04:30:29 PDT 2012

Noel Power-3 wrote
>> I can commit and push on master of course but I'd like first your opinion
>> about this.
> please commit looks like the correct fix to me ( on a side note can 
> anyone remember what ( #if _SOLAR__PRIVATE ) is all about,  I can't see 
> any reason for it in the context of this code in anycase :-/ and would 
> be tempted to delete it. And btw thanks, always a pleasure to come back 
> from vacation to see something from the to do list fixed by someone else 
> :-))) thanks again!!
> Noel
No problem, I'll do this as soon as get back home (so after day work :-) ).

BTW, I noticed that const_iterators were used. As a beginner, I don't
understand how const_iterators can work in this file whereas most of the
time the object referenced is modified, eg :
    248     for( IDEWindowTable::const_iterator it =
aIDEWindowTable.begin(); it != aIDEWindowTable.end(); ++it )
    249     {
    250         // no store; does already happen when the BasicManagers are
    251         delete it->second;
    252     }

    338     for( std::vector<IDEBaseWindow*>::const_iterator it =
aDeleteVec.begin(); it != aDeleteVec.end(); ++it )
    339     {
    340         IDEBaseWindow* pWin = *it;
    341         pWin->StoreData();

But perhaps I misunderstood something (which wouldn't be surprising :-))


View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/PATCH-fix-proposed-for-fdo-48368-tp3910905p3914140.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

More information about the LibreOffice mailing list