namespace / typing thrash ...
Lubos Lunak
l.lunak at suse.cz
Tue Apr 17 05:38:57 PDT 2012
On Tuesday 17 of April 2012, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 04/16/2012 06:23 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > On Monday 16 of April 2012, Michael Meeks wrote:
> >> Oh - and finally (Lubos) I pushed an item to the ESC agenda to discuss
> >> whether we should be exposing tons of classes and their symbols in the
> >> product, just to make unit tests work :-)
> >
> > I assume this is about 69d46dd7a6adfffd71da055bb65108c80d27395f .
>
> Would it be possible to replace gb_CppunitTest_add_library_objects with
> something that explicitly lists (only) the individual objects from the
> given library that should be linked into the test?
I doubt that would work with an application, where presumably everything is
eventually used by everything else.
But maybe gbuild could be changed to include target-specific LDFLAGS? That
way it'd be possible to build as 'make sc_ucalc_LDFLAGS=-Wl,--strip-all' .
Probably even Bjoern's --enable-debug extension can do.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lunak at suse.cz
More information about the LibreOffice
mailing list