namespace / typing thrash ...

Lubos Lunak l.lunak at suse.cz
Tue Apr 17 05:38:57 PDT 2012


On Tuesday 17 of April 2012, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 04/16/2012 06:23 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > On Monday 16 of April 2012, Michael Meeks wrote:
> >> 	Oh - and finally (Lubos) I pushed an item to the ESC agenda to discuss
> >> whether we should be exposing tons of classes and their symbols in the
> >> product, just to make unit tests work :-)
> >
> >   I assume this is about 69d46dd7a6adfffd71da055bb65108c80d27395f .
>
> Would it be possible to replace gb_CppunitTest_add_library_objects with
> something that explicitly lists (only) the individual objects from the
> given library that should be linked into the test?

 I doubt that would work with an application, where presumably everything is 
eventually used by everything else.

 But maybe gbuild could be changed to include target-specific LDFLAGS? That 
way it'd be possible to build as 'make sc_ucalc_LDFLAGS=-Wl,--strip-all' . 
Probably even Bjoern's --enable-debug extension can do.

-- 
 Lubos Lunak
 l.lunak at suse.cz


More information about the LibreOffice mailing list