[REVIEW][3-5] Re: [[REVIEW][3-5-2] fdo#47717, fdo#45562 sw: yet more border painting regressions

Michael Stahl mstahl at redhat.com
Fri Apr 20 05:42:27 PDT 2012


On 20/04/12 14:21, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 17:05 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
>> i think i've fixed this problem now (and attached your bugdoc,
>> slightly enhanced, to fdo#45562 as well), so please consider this for
>> libreoffice-3-5, which basically results in painting the borders in
>> almost exactly the same places as the old OOo code, and thus looks safe
>> to me wrt. layering:
>>
>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=5913506b2193e93ca2767ab7365ab2e76ed7848f
> 
> Hmm, doesn't apply against 3-5. Is there now a specific sequence of
> patches required against 3-5, or just the above needing to be tweaked ?

ah yes, it requires the patch from the grandparent mail as well, i.e.

http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=1024c172a5bfb3d85a86fcf7a046aa2b03950edd

which is also required for the other border line fix to apply (the one
that merges consecutive lines)



More information about the LibreOffice mailing list