Bugzilla / NEEDINFO spam ...

[Michael Meeks]

I'm forwarding the appended from Florian :-)

	It's clearly good to close the old / obsolete bugs.

	I wonder though - what metric was used; I saw us close some that might
have been in NEEDINFO state for ages, but had active comments recently.
Is it possible to filter those out in future ?

	Anyhow - thanks for all your bugzilla work,

	Regards,

		Michael.

[snip]
Dear developers / contributors of LibreOffice!

Todays cleanup of bugzilla went quite wrong. The same type of message 
got sent to a lot of you (either as reporter or CC) to you.

I really beg your pardon.

For your underatanding: I prepared to send one (1) message, but due to a 
browser, which hang itself up several times, you got 1-4 messages per 
bug. I am really very sorry for that and I hope you didn't uncced any of 
these bugs.

For more info, please write me a PM

PS: the original mail was not sent to a dev-ML would someone please 
forward it - thanks..

Yours

Florian

PS2: I attached 899 bugs, 99% would not be helpful of them and I am in 
CC of every single of them. So please don't write at me if you get too 
many mails. IMHO this was not a one-timer, but next time there will only 
be <50 bugs to change. I hope you understand why this was basically 
necessary...
[/snip]
-- 
michael.meeks at suse.com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot