[Libreoffice] Simplified C++ configuration access

Stephan Bergmann sbergman at redhat.com
Wed Feb 1 23:43:09 PST 2012

On 02/02/2012 08:31 AM, David Tardon wrote:
> Why don't you generate two overloads of the set function--one taking
> explicit context argument and the other not? Then the context could
> remain as the first argument.

Yeah, but in some cases there are already overloaded functions (the get 
functions for group and set wrappers, returning a r/w wrapper iff you 
pass in a ConfigurationChanges batch), so I didn't want to stress that 
any further.


More information about the LibreOffice mailing list