Question about iterator management in sw/source/core/fields/cellfml.cxx
julien2412
serval2412 at yahoo.fr
Thu Feb 2 12:08:37 PST 2012
Would this patch better ? (I kept the for loop)
diff --git a/sw/source/core/fields/cellfml.cxx
b/sw/source/core/fields/cellfml.cxx
index 33b953e..5c626dd 100644
--- a/sw/source/core/fields/cellfml.cxx
+++ b/sw/source/core/fields/cellfml.cxx
@@ -967,8 +967,8 @@ void SwTableFormula::GetBoxes( const SwTableBox&
rSttBox,
if( pTbl->IsHeadline( *pLine ) )
{
- rBoxes.erase( it++ );
- --it;
+ SwSelBoxes::iterator toErase = it;
+ rBoxes.erase( toErase );
}
}
} while( sal_False );
I read that to erase a position on a iterator invalidate this iterator from
position to the end
(http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/stl/vector/erase/)
I don't know if to create this temporary variable "toErase" change something
or it's all the same.
Moreover, I don't know if the evolution of the standard had changed the
behavior on this point.
Any idea ?
Julien
(sorry for the nitpicking but I'd like to understand this point)
--
View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Question-about-iterator-management-in-sw-source-core-fields-cellfml-cxx-tp3708331p3711039.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the LibreOffice
mailing list