[REVIEW]Fix for annoying bug fdo#35669

Michael Stahl mstahl at redhat.com
Wed Feb 8 06:13:54 PST 2012

On 08/02/12 15:05, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> Hi Kendy, all,
> On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 15:50 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
>>> Looked fine. Worked reasonable => pushed into 3-5-0, see
>>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-5-0&id=4632a18dae5e1770aa1da4ac55719a09c1ae461b
>>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-5-0&id=4925acf5648438589bca74f3dbfc2fc5fc9f61ab
>> The patch improved the situation for sure, so great that you've pushed
>> that, thank you!  Unfortunately it hasn't fixed all the corner cases, so
>> I had to reopen the issue + described that; but still, worth having in
>> libreoffice-3-5-0 :-)
> Could someone cherry-pick this one to 3-4 a well as this is a bug also
> in that version?

as just mentioned in the other thread:

not signing off the 3 patches for this bug for 3-4 because:
- code looks rather different there (was apparently STL converted &
  cleaned up for 3.5)
- this bug is not a regression (report says it's at least 8 years old)

More information about the LibreOffice mailing list