Same expression on both sides of '|'

[Caolán McNamara]

On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 14:32 -0800, julien2412 wrote:
> 0aaf3fb6af9dfa91b2597894930fdc8b23041308
> ... replaced this line (there are others) :
> DEF_INFO_2( INSERTONLY,        DATAENTRY,          DATAENTRY,        
> FORM_VISIBLE, DATA_PROPERTY ),
> by
> this one :
> DEF_INFO_4( INSERTONLY,        DATAENTRY,          DATAENTRY,        
> FORM_VISIBLE, DATA_PROPERTY, COMPOSEABLE, COMPOSEABLE ),
> 
> So it could be this :
> DEF_INFO_3( INSERTONLY,        DATAENTRY,          DATAENTRY,        
> FORM_VISIBLE, DATA_PROPERTY, COMPOSEABLE),
> 
> but it could also be DEF_INFO_4 with 1 extra property or even DEF_INFO_5
> with 2 extra properties.
> 
> Any idea ?

No idea really, I suggest in the absence of an alternative idea, given
that its there since 2004, to keep existing logic and go with...

DEF_INFO_3( INSERTONLY,        DATAENTRY,          DATAENTRY,
FORM_VISIBLE, DATA_PROPERTY, COMPOSEABLE),

C.