faster java compilation (was Re: linking performance (was: Re: OK to get rid of scaddins?))
noel at peralex.com
Tue Feb 14 04:30:44 PST 2012
On 2012-02-14 14:22, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Perhaps; could it also be that we like to compile with gcc in some
> eight way parallel way, but when it comes to linking, we -really-
> don't want to bog our machine down in that way ? I wonder if we could
> explicitly limit parallelism of linking in some way (?) - we should
> prolly also do this for the java compilation which is often quite
> memory intensive and doesn't do well with umpteen in parallel (at
> least on my machine).
Java compilation would be a hang of a lot faster if the build process
passed all of the java files to the compiler in one go.
Java is really not meant to be compiled in a file-at-a-time-model, it is
meant to be compiled in a single-project-at-a-time go.
Regards, Noel Grandin
More information about the LibreOffice