[PUSHED] Re: [REVIEW 3-5][PATCH] Fix leap year calculation
mstahl at redhat.com
Wed Feb 29 05:53:43 PST 2012
On 29/02/12 04:10, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> Hi there,
> The attached patch fixes a bug in our current leap year calculation
> code. It is based on the algorithm posted on wikipedia, and seems to
> correctly identify year 2000 as a leap year.
> Without this, Calc would convert 2000-2-29 into 1899-12-30 on load,
> which is ugly but very hard to detect.
argh, that misplaced "!" is entirely my fault, OOo 3.3 regression from
CWS sw33bf02 (previously dates were not checked for validity at all).
although before i removed the SvXMLUnitConverter code duplication for LO
3.5, the function was probably only used for reading the document
> Please consider this for 3.5.1, in which case I'll need 3 sign-offs. I
> haven't pushed this to master yet. I wanted to run it by Eike first
> before pushing to master.
thanks for fixing this problem!
pushed the fix plus a unit test for leap years to master,
libreoffice-3-5, libreoffice-3-5-1, libreoffice-3-4.
More information about the LibreOffice