[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Patch for "Same expression on both sides of '&&'" in basegfx module

[Caolán McNamara]

On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 20:05 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
> Hi julien2412,
> 
> On Wednesday, 2011-12-28 13:13:43 -0800, julien2412 wrote:
> 
> > On cppcheck report, there were 2 "Same expression on both sides of '&&'" on 
> > b2dpolypolygoncutter.cxx
> > 
> > I don't know how this part works so I recognize it's just guessing.
> > 
> > diff --git a/basegfx/source/polygon/b2dpolypolygoncutter.cxx
> > b/basegfx/source/polygon/b2dpolypolygoncutter.cxx
> > index d32ee87..8745241 100644
> > --- a/basegfx/source/polygon/b2dpolypolygoncutter.cxx
> > +++ b/basegfx/source/polygon/b2dpolypolygoncutter.cxx
> > @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ namespace basegfx
> >                                  bOnEdge = false;
> >                              }
> >                          }
> > -                        while(bOnEdge && pPNa2 != &rPNa && pPNa2 != &rPNa);
> > +                        while(bOnEdge && pPNa2 != &rPNa && pPNb2 != &rPNb);
> >  
> >                          if(bOnEdge)
> >                          {
> > @@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ namespace basegfx
> >                                  bOnEdge = false;
> >                              }
> >                          }
> > -                        while(bOnEdge && pPNa2 != &rPNa && pPNa2 != &rPNa);
> > +                        while(bOnEdge && pPNa2 != &rPNa && pPNb2 != &rPNb);
> >  
> >                          if(bOnEdge)
> >                          {
> > 
> > Does it seem ok ? (If yes, I can commit and push it on master branch)
> 
> I think so, but I'm not sure either. Anyone with a second opinion?

Change seems reasonable to me FWIW, presumably Thorsten knows best what
basegfx wants to do here.

C.