[Libreoffice] unnecessary building basegfx twice ?
sbergman at redhat.com
Fri Jan 6 06:12:40 PST 2012
On 01/06/2012 02:24 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> Still, what prevents us from saying that a particular build of this
> "extension" as shipped with LO x.y, works only with LO x.y?
OOo has a OpenOffice.org-maximal-version dependency for that; would need
to replicate that as LibreOffice-maximal-version (in addition to the
Another problem is how .oxt libraries find the internal LO libraries:
* On Linux, the .oxt library's RPATH would need to include the relative
path from the .oxt location to the program/ directory. A dirty hack
would be to hard-code the ../../.. length of the path from bundled .oxts
to program/, and demand that such extensions can only be installed
bundled (not user or shared).
* On Mac OS X, a similar hack with @loader_path would be needed
(referencing relative to @executable_path would not work, as .oxt
libraries are also loaded via uno executable from URE layer).
* On Windows, default library search order (next to executable) makes
this a non-issue for soffice.bin, but still would cause problems with
the uno executable.
More information about the LibreOffice