[Libreoffice] [REVIEW]Fix for annoying bug fdo#35669
Cedric Bosdonnat
cbosdonnat at suse.com
Mon Jan 30 09:16:12 PST 2012
Hi Michael,
On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 19:35 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
> On 26/01/12 19:30, Michael Stahl wrote:
> > On 26/01/12 16:21, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Could someone review and cherry-pick this commit to -3-5, -3-5-0 and
> >> -3-4?
> >> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=5e51960dede5015b862df05b7b16f02884647889
> >
> > your fix looks good to me, except for the line:
> >
> > sal_uInt16 nMaxDstId = *aIds.end();
>
> oops, now it occurs to me that dereferencing end() is a bad idea in any
> case, you probably want to use rbegin() instead :)
>
> > if i'm reading this right, then aIds could be empty here, if the source
> > document has seq field references, and the target document has no seq
> > field references but note references.
> >
> > suggest to wrap an "if (!aIds.empty())" around the whole block?
> > no need to adjust anything in that case, right?
Fixed in
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=458d56d9b35f2ecb2eea2589737079390b10ee26
Would be nice to cherry-pick these two commits to -3-5, -3-4 and 3-5-0
(if it's not too late).
Regards,
--
Cedric
More information about the LibreOffice
mailing list