fdo 50950 make (ISO)WEEKNUM comply with ODFF1.2, advise asked

Eike Rathke erack at redhat.com
Thu Jul 12 07:43:35 PDT 2012

Hi Winfried,

On Wednesday, 2012-07-11 16:49:13 +0200, Winfried Donkers wrote:

> I uploaded a new diff file to bug 50950.

Please see my splinter review in

> I haven't started on the proper processing of saved old-style arguments as a strange thing is happening:
> When running the modified code, LibO does not recognise WEEKNUM and does recognise WEEKNUM_ADD, although I cannot find any text 'WEEKNUM_ADD' in the code!

That's added automatically in AnalysisAddIn::getDisplayFunctionName()
and you need to change the corresponding function data. See my review
annotation in the bug.


LibreOffice Calc developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer.
GnuPG key 0x293C05FD : 997A 4C60 CE41 0149 0DB3  9E96 2F1A D073 293C 05FD
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20120712/da0943b2/attachment.pgp>

More information about the LibreOffice mailing list