sorted_vector, constness, pointers, and structs
noelgrandin at gmail.com
Wed Jul 18 12:49:35 PDT 2012
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Lubos Lunak <l.lunak at suse.cz> wrote:
> You didn't read further than that part above, did you?
> What you want is broken. It is definitely broken from the theoretical point
> of view, since modifying the items may change the sort order.
Aaaaaargh. Instead of casting aspersions on my replies, how about you
actually read the o3tl::sorted_vector.hxx code and look at some of the
use-cases in the LO codebase.
What is broken is attempting to provide a level of protection that is
not useful in practice, mostly get bypassed, and does not play nice
with the C++ type-system.
Now, however, if you look at my original email, I make some
suggestions that will actually improve things.
For example, we can split the problem into 2 sub-use-cases
Then for each of these cases, we can apply some degree (but not a lot)
More information about the LibreOffice