Adding bibisect repository support to tinbuild2
mstahl at redhat.com
Fri Jul 27 10:22:29 PDT 2012
On 27/07/12 19:15, Robinson Tryon wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
> <bjoern.michaelsen at canonical.com> wrote:
>> Hi Robinson, Hi Norbert,
>> can anyone of you join the QA Call:
>> to report about the tinbuild/bibisect progress?
> Hi Bjoern,
> Sorry I wasn't able to make the QA call.
> One thought that came to me yesterday re: unified bibisect repository
> is that it would be great to have some older builds from 3.4 and
> before in there. I think it's fine if the older point releases don't
> have as fine a resolution as 3.5 and 3.6, but it would be great to
> have at least enough builds to pinpoint in which LO point release the
> bug appeared (or if a bug predates the creation of LO altogether).
yeah that would be fine indeed, but it's unfortunately a complete PITA
to build the pre-3.5 stuff because some genius had the glorious idea to
split the code across 20 git repositories, so good luck trying to find a
combination of revisions from all these that actually builds successfully.
More information about the LibreOffice