Any JNI/UNO bridge experts around? Some assumptions about field ids are apparently not valid for Dalvik

Stephan Bergmann sbergman at
Mon Mar 26 08:52:29 PDT 2012

On 03/26/2012 05:06 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 03/26/2012 12:21 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
>> The following patch seems to help, does it look sane?
> Tor, I see you pushed this now, although it is wrong (or at least does
> not address the root of the problem, which is that
> JNI_compound_type_info makes's m_base
> erroneously point to instead of null.
> I'm working on a proper fix, but gbuild'ification of jvmfwk breaking the
> old testtools/source/bridgetest tests makes this take a little longer...

Pushed proper fix now; reverted previous one.


More information about the LibreOffice mailing list