[PATCH-3-5] fdo#35270 - kill first-use grammar checker freeze ...

[Daniel Naber]

On Montag, 21. Mai 2012, Olivier R. wrote:

Hello Olivier,

> The differences look imho more technical than philosophical, even if
> there are specific features in both of them.

thanks for your explanations of the LT/Lightproof differences.

> Another solution might be to tag Hunspell dictionaries with
> LT tags, but all Hunspell dictionaries were probably not conceived with
> grammar checking in mind, and that’s probably more a dream than a
> doable solution.

Yes, the difficulty comes from the flags used in hunspell. If a hunspell 
dictionary was just a long list of words without flags, one could easily add 
the tags from LT to each word.

> If Lightproof could use LT lexicons, that could be a temporary solution,
> but maybe memory-consuming, as you would have a dictionary for spell
> checking and a lexicon for grammar checking.

I have never tried that but I think the finite state machine used internally 
by LT is quite memory-friendly.

If we could work together more closely that would be great. As you know, 
each rule in LT has an id so it can be identified. Maybe that id could be 
used to keep track of similar rules. Does LightProof also have integrated 
test sentences? Then LT could use them to see what rules are missing in LT 
and vice-versa.

Regards
 Daniel

-- 
http://www.danielnaber.de